she is hot/he is cute
By Geocklyn Ajuora| first impression |
We’re all terribly unobjective with our emotional lives. We
can’t seem to help it either. We all have ideals and dreams of what we want our
perfect partner to be, what we want our perfect relationship to be, how we want
our relationships to play out. Therefore we tend to see what we want to see in
someone else, not what’s actually there. We’re all experts at projecting and
distorting the reality in front of us to try to fit our own ideals. These
distortions are called perceptual biases.
They are the fun-house mirrors that misshape our perceptions of others in front
of us. Some people are (far) more afflicted than others, but none of us are
immune to it. But with practice and conscious awareness, we can help ourselves
become more aware of these biases, and prevent them from getting us into too
much turmoil.
Perhaps the biggest problem with both psychological research
on attraction and relationships/dating advice is that we’re trying to measure
and quantify something we can’t be completely objective about. Psychological
research into attraction is mostly based on self-reporting. Dating advice is based
on personal experience. The problem with both approaches is that we’re unable
to provide reliable data. We’re poor curators of our own emotional experiences.
The phenomenon of perceptual biases has intrigued me for a couple years now.
Many of my close friends have grown annoyed and tired of me constantly pointing
out their biases to them. “You only liked her that much because she was the
only girl on the bus,” or “Yeah, it makes it a lot easier when they think your
job is cool.” Yeah, I’m a buzzkill.
Below are ten perceptual biases
that most of us fall victim to, five which distort how attractive we perceive
someone to be, and five that distort how emotionally connected to a person we
feel.
Perceptual Biases of Attraction
1.
Contrast
Bias – The contrast bias occurs when we meet a moderately attractive person
in an environment with unattractive people (and vice versa).1 For instance, if
you go to an office party, the one cute girl at work will suddenly look like a
stunner surrounded by a bunch of married, aging, overweight women. Put that
same girl in a night club and she’d look pretty average. But at the office
party, suddenly her stock has shot through the roof. Another common example is
when you have the “hot friend” phenomenon. When you meet a group of women, all
of which are unattractive except for one. Suddenly that one attractive woman
looks a lot better. Welcome to the contrast bias.
2.
Scarcity
Bias – The scarcity bias2 is similar to the
contrast bias, except instead of overestimating how attractive a person is
based on other people being unattractive, the scarcity bias overestimates how
attractive a person i because the e are few or no other options. A perf ct
example of this happened with a friend recently in Thailand. We were taking a
boat tour, and there was a very plain-looking French girl on our boat, along
with about 12 Chinese tourists, most of whom were elderly or older couples. My
friend started chatting to the French girl, who was pleasant but nothing really
too exciting. By the end of the fullday boat tour, he excitedly described to me
how they traded Facebook information and how he thought he liked her and wanted
to meet up with her. I looked him in the eye and said, “You liked that she was the
only available woman on a boat that you were stuck on for 12 hours, that’s what
you liked. By tomorrow you’ll have forgotten about her.” Sure enough, he did.
3.
Reciprocal
Bias – The quote of mine that’s been passed around the dating industry more
than any other is, “The biggest aphrodisiac is someone who likes you.” This is
the reciprocal bias.3 That cute girl, as
soon as she grabs your hand and tells you that you’re hot, goes from “cute” to
“really sexy” in a heartbeat. The reciprocal bias goes in reverse as well. That
“smoking hot woman” over there, once you talk to her and she shows absolutely
no interest in you, immediately turns into that woman “with a nice body, but
terrible attitude,” and you’ve already convinced yourself that you’d never date
her and that you were stupid for wanting to.
4.
Personality
Bias – The personality bias may be one of the only good biases. The
personality bias occurs when someone’s personality makes them appear more
physically attractive to you.4 When a woman has a
great sense of humor, or shares similar interests to us, or has similar
perspectives on life, we inevitably find them to be more attractive.
5.
Barriers
Bias – The barriers bias relates to the scarcity bias in that we tend to
overvalue things in which we perceive to be hard to obtain. The barriers bias
occurs when there are barriers to being with a particular person, causing our
attraction for them to increase.5 An extreme example
of this would be celebrities. From a purely physical perspective, you and I
probably meet women who are just as physically attractive as celebrities, but
our perception of them would not be even close to the same. The barriers bias
can play out on a large or small scale. The girl you were talking to and her
friend stepped in and dragged her away, chances are you are going to remember
her as more attractive and more interested than she actually was. The girl you
meet who is moving across the country tomorrow, otherwise she would definitely
go out on a date with you, your perception of her will probably be that she’s
more attractive as well.
The barriers bias also affects
relationships or perceptions of relationship material as well. We have a
tendency to idealize people we’re unable to be with, both in terms of how
attractive they are, but also in terms of how good our relationship would be
with them. Which brings us to…
Perceptual Biases in Relationships
6.
Physical
Bias – Plain and simple, the more physically attractive a woman is, the
more likely we will be to idealize her, overestimate her, and become
emotionally invested in her.6 As men, our
emotions are yanked around by how physically beautiful a woman is. And it’s a
pretty short leash.
This one definitely afflicts me often, and I hate that it
does. I would like to say I’m not so shallow, but the more physically beautiful
she is, the more I’m going to invest in her emotionally, and the more I’m going
to convince myself that there’s potential for something more significant with
her when there probably actually isn’t. Believe it or not, the physical bias
can actually be negative as well, depending on a guy’s beliefs. I have met a
number of guys who, when confronted with an attractive woman, will get excited
and talk about how attractive she is. But when confronted with an absolutely
drop-dead gorgeous woman, they begin to nitpick faults and criticize her before
even meeting her. If a man believes himself to be unworthy of a supremely
beautiful woman, he will actually develop a perceptual bias AGAINST them.
7.
Sexual Bias
– One of my strictest rules for myself and my clients is to never make any
major commitment decisions with a woman without having sex with her first.
Aside from the whole “test drive before you buy” argument, the fact remains
that men are not objective about a woman before we’ve had sex with her. We
inflate our perception of them and overestimate how much we actually like them.
Yeah, it’s screwed up, but it is what it is. The reverse is often (but not
always) true as well: that our perception of a woman immediately after sex will
be deflated and we will underestimate what we actually feel for her.
8.
Mystery Bias
– This one is probably more common for women than men, but we both do it. The
mystery bias occurs when you really like someone, but you don’t know a whole
lot about them yet. The less we know about them, the more we fill in the gaps
with our own idealizations of who they are.7 This can be
particularly dangerous if we’re not able to be around them often, such as in a
long-distance relationship scenario.
Long distance is so dangerous emotionally because we’re not
forced to be in the other person’s business all of the time, our communication
is always full of excitement and longing. The multitude of boring, drab
interactions where she does a myriad of minor things to annoy you are missing.
You don’t see their flaws, only their virtues, since that’s all you have time
to show to one another. As a result you replace their flaws in your mind with
made up virtues. And eventually reality comes and bites you in the ass.
9.
Turbulence
Bias – The turbulence bias is when we overestimate the emotional connection
and compatibility
we have with someone whom we’ve suffered through a lot of emotionally difficult
circumstances with.
This can play out in a number of ways. A girl who you’ve
gone through a traumatic event
with can suddenly seem like someone you relate to and connect with on a deeper
level than you actually do. Or, with a girlfriend who you keep breaking up and
reuniting with, it’s easy to perceive those break ups and reunions as further
proof that you two belong together, since you’ve gone through so much together.
Or the girl who is cheating on her boyfriend with you, and is struggling to
decide whether to end that relationship or not and the drama that ensues as a
result, one can easily feel that these struggles and obstacles you overcome
together “mean” something, and imply that there’s some deeper purpose for you
being together. This is all fantasy. It’s a romantic concept better left to
Disney movies.
10.
Serendipity
Bias – Another romantic fallacy. The serendipity bias is when we interpret
coincidences involving a woman to signify something deeper or some sort of
“fate” that is bringing you two together.8 For instance,
maybe you go on a few dates with a woman who moves away to go to grad school.
You then take a job overseas in Barcelona, and just happen to run into her
walking around Barri Gotic. She’s studying abroad. The spark reignites, except
this time you can’t help but feel that there’s some deeper purpose that’s
bringing you together. As a result, you overvalue the meaning of the
relationship and perhaps see an emotional connection that isn’t really there.
Perceptual biases are an inevitable part of dating. Of
course, I’m being a little hyperbolic when I claim we all “suck” at dating. The
fact of the matter is the dating game is a numbers game, and all of us are
going to strike out the vast, vast majority of the time. Whether an interaction
ends within five seconds or five years, almost all of your relationships are
going to end. The hard part is knowing when they’re ending or if they should
end or not. We’re all bad at that. Perceptual biases act as a fog that most of
us have trouble wading through and realizing there are obstacles in front of us
until we smack right into them. The goal is not to get rid of perceptual
biases, but to understand them and become aware of them. Perceptual biases can
be enjoyable at times, but they can be dangerous as well. Know and understand
which ones you’re susceptible to, and se that understanding to inform your relationship you can spare yourself a little extra heart break.
Footnotes
for more of this visit geocklyn.blogspot.com
1.
Kenrick, D. T.,
& Gutierres, S. E. (1980). Contrast effects and judgments of physical
attractiveness: When beauty becomes a social problem. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 38(1), 131– 140.↵
2.
Mittone, L., & Savadori, L. (2009). The Scarcity
Bias. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 58(3), 453–468.↵
3.
Montoya, R. M.,
& Insko, C. A. (2008). Toward a more
complete understanding of the reciprocity of liking effect. European
Journal of Social Psychology, 38(3), 477–498.↵
4.
Montoya, R. M.,
& Horton, R. S. (2013). A meta-analytic investigation of the
processes underlying the similarity-attraction effect. Journal of Social and Personal
Relationships, 30(1), 64–94.↵
5.
Parker, J.,
& Burkley, M. (2009). Who’s chasing
whom? The impact of gender and relationship status on mate poaching. Journal of
Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 1016–1019.↵
6.
Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285.↵
7.
Norton, M. I.,
Frost, J. H., & Ariely, D. (2007). Less is more: the lure of ambiguity,
or why familiarity breeds contempt. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 92(1), 97.↵
8.
Jung, C. G. (2010). Synchronicity:
An Acausal Connecting Principle .
(Vol. 20). Princeton University Press.↵
No comments:
Post a Comment